The vexed issue of sustainability

In a long and frequently tetchy Council meeting on 24 July, my written question on legal representation at the forthcoming Feniton appeals was raised. The question read:

It appears likely that Feniton’s four planning appeals will be heard as one merged public inquiry. Given that the over-riding reason for EDDC’s refusal of these applications was ‘sustainability’, would the Council agree to outsource its legal representation to a QC specialising in planning and, more specifically, sustainability? Feniton is bracing itself to be in the eye of the media storm yet again, and it is vital that appeals are won, both to Feniton and EDDC.

I received the following written response:

I am disappointed that the Councillor demonstrates such a low opinion of our staff, particularly when our appeal success rate is well above the national average with 75% of appeals against the Council’s decision to refuse planning permission being dismissed. That being said our legal team will assess the best way forward and if external legal representation is appropriate it will be engaged.

I was not best pleased at being represented as being critical of legal officers. Sustainability is an extremely complex issue and, despite being a remarkably vague term, is the cornerstone of the NPPF (i.e. planning policy). My supplementary question was:

I take absolute exception to the response to my question stating that I have a low opinion of legal staff. Nothing could be further from the truth. However, the appeals in Feniton, if amalgamated, will no doubt be reported in the national press with obvious implications for the reputation of the Council if legal defence fails. If the Council loses this ‘super-appeal’, it will be liable for costs. I ask you to consider investment in a barrister who has a proven track record in winning appeals involving sustainability.

The Leader of the Council referred me back to his original answer and said that the Legal Department would be assessing the requirement for external legal representation.

This entry was posted in News. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The vexed issue of sustainability

  1. Roger Giles Ottery St Mary EX11 1AR says:

    Susie asked a quite legitimate question on behalf of her consituents in Feniton, which had potential implications and benefits for the whole of East Devon. It was quite deplorable that the EDDC Council Leader should respond to the question by falsely claiming that Susie had a low opinion of EDDC staff. Quite how that accords with the EDDC Code of Conduct of treating people with respect perhaps Council Leader Paul Diviani would like to explain.

Leave a Reply to Roger Giles Ottery St Mary EX11 1AR Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s